CO129-260 - Governor Sir Robinson Acting Governor O-Brien - 1893 [9-12] — Page 545

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

542

The Magistrate forfeited the opium and there was no appeal naturally and Mr. Logan was respondent. I did not appear for the Government as I considered the decision wrong. Government prosecution. When the Magistrate forfeited the opium the Company claimed a share of the proceeds. When the Extreme Court reversed the Magistrate's decision the Company threw their own officer overboard to speak and declined to pay the costs ordered by the Court of Appeals to be paid by Logan the respondent.

They tried, in my opinion most unjustifiably, to make the Government pay the costs of the appeal and of course failed in their attempt.

H. Meigh Goodman
14th Decr. 1893.
Attorney General.

Enclosure 3.

Secretary, General Chamber of Commerce to Colonial Secretary.

Sir,

Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce,
Hongkong 4th December 1895.

I am instructed by my Committee to forward you copy of a letter, dated 18th August last from the Secretary of the Hong Kong, Canton and Macao Steamboat Co. Ltd., and Messrs Butterfield & Swire, Agents of the China Navigation Co. Ltd., in which they refer to this Chamber and make complaint they have to make of the oppressive nature of the opium Ordinance as regards the restoration of confiscated ...

Edit History

2026-05-27 06:42:47 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
542 The Magistrate forfeited the opium and there was no appeal naturally and Mr. Logan was respondent. I did not appear for the Government as I considered the decision wrong. Government prosecution. When the Magistrate forfeited the opium the Company claimed a share of the proceeds. When the Extreme Court reversed the Magistrate's decision the Company threw their own officer overboard to speak and declined to pay the costs ordered by the Court of Appeals to be paid by Logan the respondent. They tried, in my opinion most unjustifiably, to make the Government pay the costs of the appeal and of course failed in their attempt. H. Meigh Goodman 14th Decr. 1893. Attorney General. Enclosure 3. Secretary, General Chamber of Commerce to Colonial Secretary. Sir, Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce, Hongkong 4th December 1895. I am instructed by my Committee to forward you copy of a letter, dated 18th August last from the Secretary of the Hong Kong, Canton and Macao Steamboat Co. Ltd., and Messrs Butterfield & Swire, Agents of the China Navigation Co. Ltd., in which they refer to this Chamber and make complaint they have to make of the oppressive nature of the opium Ordinance as regards the restoration of confiscated ...
Baseline (Original)
542 The Magistrate porfeited: the apicem and there was nakuis appeal naturally 、,?? and Mr. Logan wad rev- pordont. I did not appear for the Government as I considered the decision. nola and it coas claimed ́'a wrong. Government prosecution. When the Magistrate forfeited, the - opium the Company cías share of the proceeds. When the Expreme Court reversed the Ma- gistrate's decision the Company throw their ower officer overboard 20 to speak and declined to pay he costs ordered by the Court of Appeals to be paid by Logan the respondent. mak: They tried, in my opi. nion most unjustifiably, to mok the Government pay the costs of the appeal and of course failed' in their attempt. (5%). H. Meigh Goodman 14th Decr. 1893. Attorney General. Enclosure 3. Secretary, General Chamber of Com- to Colonial Secretary. Sir, linetce. Hong Kong General) Chamber of Commerce, Hongrong 4th December 1895. * 1 7 8 instructed. by my Committee to forward you copy of a letter, dated 18th An the Secretary of 18th August last from the Stor Hong Kong, Can. son and Macao Steamboat Coy. Lt?, and Messrs Butterfield réving Agents of the China Navigation Cory ht? in which they refer to this; Chamber a w con complaint they have to make of the oppressive. ssive nature. the ipium Ordinance as the restoration of confiscated ,, gards Ke ding
2026-05-27 06:42:47 · Baseline
View content

542

The Magistrate porfeited: the apicem

and there was nakuis

appeal

naturally

、,??

and Mr. Logan

wad rev-

pordont. I did not appear for

the Government as I considered

the decision.

nola

and it coas

claimed ́'a

wrong. Government prosecution. When the Magistrate forfeited, the - opium the Company cías

share of the proceeds. When the Expreme Court reversed the Ma- gistrate's decision the Company throw their ower officer overboard 20 to speak and declined to pay

he costs ordered by the Court of Appeals to be paid by Logan the respondent.

mak:

They tried, in

my opi. nion most unjustifiably, to mok the Government pay the costs of the appeal and of course failed' in their attempt.

(5%). H. Meigh Goodman

14th Decr. 1893.

Attorney General.

Enclosure 3.

Secretary, General Chamber of Com-

to Colonial Secretary.

Sir,

linetce.

Hong Kong General) Chamber of Commerce,

Hongrong 4th December 1895.

* 1 7 8

instructed.

by my

Committee to forward you copy of

a letter, dated 18th An

the Secretary of

18th August last from

the Stor

Hong Kong, Can. son and Macao Steamboat Coy. Lt?, and Messrs Butterfield réving Agents of the China Navigation

Cory ht? in which they refer to this;

Chamber a w con

complaint they have to make of the oppressive.

ssive nature. the ipium Ordinance as

the restoration of confiscated

,,

gards

Ke

ding

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.